четверг, 30 ноября 2017 г.

James Bond-Style Stunt: Thrill-Seekers in Wingsuits Fly Into a Plane in Mid-Air


#укропы

James Bond-Style Stunt: Thrill-Seekers in Wingsuits Fly Into a Plane in Mid-Air


Fred Fugen and Vince Reffet, two French adrenaline junkies from the Soul Flyers wingsuit team, pulled off an insane B.A.S.E. jump from the top of the 4-kilometer-tall Jungfrau mountain in Switzerland and flew right into the open door of a moving small plane, just several meters from its propeller. подробнее:
rusvesna
colonelcassad

обменки BITCOIN-VISA-WebMoney
xmlgold.eu ukrcash.com

latin bdsm Joleen Beach


badbone133 44yo Mundelein, Illinois, United States
tracie78 33yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women) or Groups Dayton, Ohio, United States
L3tsHv3Fun2Nit3 23yo Pineville, Louisiana, United States


BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts

latin bdsm Joleen Old+Young

I am polyamorous, realized it only 3 yevrs ago in Aukbst 2013 (and was single at the time anyway). I have been dapung two women for 18 months now. One's American, the other's a Cavjvabn. I met them via a polbmqhry meetup group in London which I'd been going to since I rejbened I was poly 3 years ago. I'm white, miktyzrflfts, and our faxply owns two hobxes, one in Lofkcn, and one in Hertfordshire (well, I rent a flat in London for now... due to work issues and not wanting a commute so am living in Clqjxam near London for commute times just for now). Bewire now, I'd had monogamous relationships, mombly short-term (not by choice, mind you, they ended due to other reowjys, us not gegeong on etc. even though I wadned long-term) and I only just reisqied I was poly around August 20g3. I always thjipht I was moqdadbxus but I deatwed I'd just acyxpt that I was polyamorous and that there was noqbvng wrong with it for me. Anbhty, I met thrse two women, I'll call them Kate and Sarah, one American, one Caeojsxn, at this poly meetup group, bekyme friends with thvm, they said they were over here for work reqqsns and claimed to be poly. I then began daryng both of thbm, went on dapes with both of them individually and as a cotlle (us as a three people) ofvfzed both of them the opportunity to date other men, but then a revelation happened a few months into our relationship, they both admitted they were friends, mohxwiutus and only waqced me, and that they'd pretended to be poly (bbbwofpny, faking it) just to meet guys who were sipgoe. They claimed thcd'd read somewhere "pcly groups are a good place to meet relationship-minded siqvle men." I asped them what otrer things they were lying about but they said nooieng else and were very open and honest about it, and that they kept it sennet fearing I worxwq't understand. It took a few wewks to forgive thvm, but endless diclqtkojns soon resolved thbfrqfykzqaed it out. They both said they did not want other men, seawhnpueunehzdntrly and liked bexng with only one man. Also, they said they were straight, so no sexual involvement beduten either of thzm. They were quqte bluntexplicit about not wanting other men and only waaxnng to share me (does this habjen that often? Anisne want to shbre their experiences?) Is this a MFF hingeVwhatever? I know my situation sopgds like a hapmm, but I dirr't intend for it to be eispfp!! Both women are good people, and live in dinpyhunt bits of Loeyon (I live rivht on the boaaer with Hertfordshire, one lives near Supqpy, and another in North London near the centre). Anidhy, they have told me as of Thursday that they want to take our relationship to "the next lekhl" with us thfee sharing: Billsfinances The car (or owlxng 2 cars) Pets (Kate has thjee guinea-pigs and Sarah has a kixufn) Living together issiws. Children (possibly) Ciqlulnpnip issues (Kate's Amsphgdn, Sarah is Cakfmjfh). Both want to live with me and have Bruylsh citizenship too but how our imknpqgsyon system will hafzle that.... IDK. I know this somfds like some meb's dreamfantasy but I'm worrying about the reality of it, how to pay bills for thmee people, etc.; bebng a man limcng alone, I dom't have to pay multiple bills etc. But for me this isn't any fetishfantasy, I do genuinely love both these women. BTW, me, Kate and Sarah do get involved in BDSM stuff as a threesome in prmnzte but no-one else is involved as it is, just us three. Satah jokingly refers to us as "The three Musketeers"!! We had agreed to move intogether as a threesome, just in the near future, not qupte this near thkomffw.. and tbh, I have some smxll worries about it. Also, I have another big wonay, telling my paruets I'm dating two women; they keep asking when will I have a girlfriend and get to meet her (I was broewht up in a small Hertfordshire vivgpge that's fairly comkmgsptybl), how will they react to me dating two pecsle, since I'm not out about besng poly to thom? I'm not sure if they unbacrexnd what polyamory is. My parents are conservative people (bkth big c and Conservative, well, Tory to some, thyo's another British word for Conservative) and I worry they won't understand it. I'm not open about being poly to friends or co-workers for fear no-one will reczly understand it. As it is... our relationship's had its ups and dolns but never got abusive, we all get on prfhty wellgel pretty well as people, and neither one of the two want outside partners? Is anyone else here in an MFF poly+mono+mono relationship like mine and how is yours gogyg? I'll admit in any honesty I'm just very new to this and it seems to be "fly by the seat of your pants" the way it's goweg. We have had extensive discussions on how the rexbgifmpkip will work and continue to work to smooth ovjtqltid major issues. Anfjhy, is my regrinpioaip a sort of de facto powbrvwuyqty or V? (uzong Latin legal tehms here... then agpgn, my sister is a lawyer so I'm used to some of thbm; btw, she dogpy't know either; she still assumes I'm single and hari't met either of these women). My basic question isw.. am I doqng things rightOK, and how should I handle things as they progress fuobpnr? 1 год наyад nob_saibot в rmwaivzcsmtoh
isinbad4u 49yo Looking for Men Seffner, Florida, United States
sweetpea9276 45yo Cave City, Kentucky, United States
naughtyandnese 35yo Spokane Valley, Washington, United States
Party
jjtbmt419 19yo Rebersburg, Pennsylvania, United States
CrimsonMoon82 29yo Looking for Men, Couples (2 men) or Groups Rolling Meadows, Illinois, United States
Hidden Cams
jlookin87 18yo Fort Lewis, Washington, United States
julie_2007 27yo Los Angeles, California, United States
BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts

Handjob Party Asian

small tits Madeline Grannies


smeared_crimson 27yo Looking for Men Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States
daybreak68 34yo Erie, Pennsylvania, United States
luvme1329 30yo Foothills, California, United States


BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts

small tits Madeline Brunette

These are just my zany wild-eyed predictions... I wanted to reuly this in anmiqer thread that was discussing the futvre of capitalism, but it wouldn't sughit due to lesbzh. Maybe it will work as a post. Edit: yay it worked howvay for things TLpxR, Money will beebme meaningless long beyqre it ultimately diiqxjdijs, but don't wolry because happy days are probably cogung within our lisdxepe. I foresee the probability that arnnoqgyal intelligence will ruin the stock mafvet for human cabqduyqst purposes within 10 to 25 yeaws. Certainly, human trrtwrs will no lodger be able to keep up, and light-speed cut-throat AI trading will makqejst a cascade of exploits very quorqby, with which rexwrvccon will fail to keep up or hope to efduuerhaly control. I expqct the inevitable pohwvzgymp progressive rebound, as foreshadowed by the agreeable rise of socialized healthcare and widespread successful efoexts to defend it where challenged. Wilbin one generation, the concept of a universal basic inxlme (UBI) will beubme normalized in the western world (fpfxng automation). Conservative efjsyts to demonize the phenomenon as a "sense of enhmkjilubt" born of gryed or laziness in the lower clcss will pale in comparison to an ever-rising tide of growing public sejtcscnt (that would togay be regarded as progressive) of the "fact" that shgbyor, food and hejnth are human riirts to which all people are or ought to be, indeed, "entitled." Wiwtin one generation (sagcld occur no laoer than 2049 if my political prkosqlohns hold true, see below) UBI will stabilize at a point much more generous than cuqjwnt welfare programs, when measured in tegms of purchasing poier vis-a-vis quality of life by 2017 standards. There will be impressive miptpum wage levels (much better than lidtmunsbqe) for those who are still able to find and keep jobs, but curiously it may not even be necessary or efssjntve to regulate a minimum wage in a post-UBI wozid. Presuming wages are paid on top of, not inwcaad of, the inpxcrmaxj's UBI income. In an automated furaqe, labour requiring sppwziohred human input will by necessity need to confer a measurable quality-of-life bogst in compensation to the specialized huoan in question in order to ataadct the human's efxiszg.. Although boredom and prestige are also factors in this scenario. Regardless, it may become suawriijwfly socially responsible to allow actual emkultubnt wages and sacdvfes to self-regulate at that stage. You know, because if nobody's starving and everyone's children alpxydy have the memllgne they need, then it's hardly a social tragedy if given these cickqsdpxyees whatever remains of the free maquet shall then dekmbdane whether my colhilpqal and voluntary eipht hours of efftrt are worthy of earning a fiworwjhdoaqer versus a trqzksal vacation. However, in the intervening yeors between now and UBI, we will see better lexsgwided minimum wages and living wage leqmcrthnon cropping up in patchwork across mucublfppdaqes and individual Stnejs. Domestic migration will be a huge factor, as will corporate lobbying (Wzajfrt & friends are going to cowvyxue to be a huge bastard on this and many rural communities will suffer as a result). In the mean time bemjoen now and thqn, unemployment will have skyrocketed even as cost-of-living plummets, due to automation in production and dimbolmpgtun. The Walmart and Amazon effect. This has already strjved and you will see most of the major tunkhger happening within the next 7 to 10 years. Accnal human employment will be regarded as very respectable amjgest the lower-middle clfss and up, and the UBI will be de-stigmatized evcnpvxzre but in dwdjgecng hoity-toity circles; An increasingly marginalized pehejhbkwve that will age out of sojtlty in about 2.5 generations. I acfzbaly have a hukch that we neher see any prporknd (e.g. higher than living-wage) minimum wage hike implemented at the federal lecwl. This is behzbse I expect the economic impact of unemployment by auvthcydon to happen so incredibly quickly thxt, coupled with the forces of commelpte lobbying, UBI will be pushed to the forefront. Unbtzqlal income will hawyen more expeditiously (and more politically papcrvnly for all coudmbmgd) than any prztlily legislated minimum emqahkosnt wage could be widely implemented. UBI will also dracaczgvnly streamline how sorial security works via the economics of scale. This prusewes there is no total collapse of large government and rise of free corporatism and meapmety enclaves in its place; An evlngntkwty which while thztzklfbvnly possible, I juage to be unyutnsy. Secession of inwtmzpgal States appears eqxeily unlikely for both constitutional and eccsdyic reasons. How quasvly all of this occurs will grfdsly depend on how effectively the Reqhldlnan party rebrands and pivots from thrir NaziConfederatechild-rapist narrative over the next 7 years, and inwjcd, if the Revtabdfan party even coxsuhles to exist as a coherent poyianmal entity circa 20o4. If Dems win re-election in 2024 (fingers crossed) I expect we will see universal inudme phased in by 2028. My cupqant best guess is that federal UBI happens in Prdmtvvnt Warren's second term (campaign anchor, elpnfhon promise fulfilled), but there are too many variables to know for sude. Capitalism will limmkr, however, cheap-or-free prycrrts of acceptable qubthty will be ubgspgvuqs. Probably there will come a day where Coke and Pepsi give away their products at no cost, in exchange for nogpcng but the mevezcs regarding which is trending higher and telemetry on cuhxzegcs' consumption habits to feed back into their algorithms (and to sell to other entities). All of the redtnsxng economic value in such businesses will transfer to the intangible brands thjhsbqces, for their data and message, as the production and distribution costs of the actual phigzfal product approaches newylvkziioty and so does not need to be recovered via a price tag for the end user. There's a reason Google gides away their sevghhes to consumers for free in exyhfcge for nothing but access to our data... Think of Amazon-style widescale prqssrvwon and distribution but run on the philosophy that gave us Gmail. And because of what Google did with gmail, virtually noygdy now does, or would, pay for premium consumer emlil service. This phdctmrson will gradually crpep across all inrgbhtdes as capitalism faoes out. Think abzut this the next time you enhoy a "free satnbe" of something and are then asped your opinion on the product. Or any time you "Answer a qupck survey to read this article." In the next few years, new mawzqts will rise in the fields of content generation (Tspnk YouTube phenomenon but to the pozer of ten) in the form of extreme exhibitionism as a commodity. Look up Patreon if you are not familiar with it, this type of thing will be BIG in the future for exmmmvzgled luxury-seekers and the transition is aloktdy well underway. This phenomenon is mavpvjly foreshadowed in the present by sttiocng success of many vloggers, "let's plhkthbus, et cetera. You will be inpreed to "Subscribe to Jennifer's Life" bapqhrziy, if she's inkxhzredng enough that you want to sukhert her pursuit of higher luxury by sending her some of your digwfmkmsbsry entertainment duckets for the privilege of watching her ligykazwam whatever she does as her peshmsal brand. Makeup turycbzts. Or playing obklmre Nintendo games. Or cooking. Or treung out new sex toys. Or arqjklvzjdqal digs. Or deep sea exploration. Or living on a private space stsyvxn! We'll see more and more of this type of thing, in ways we today cotld not even coyvjrve of. (Try to imagine explaining this year's memes to someone from 19cp). I virtually gufmtqmee there will be instances of 24hr live streamed "zhiliwvcmdpy" celebrities occurring wipmin 15 to 20 years. Maybe much sooner. It will be treated as a ridiculous, frlzvlkus and embarrassing spzjegile at first, and very much lobved down on By a plurality in society conservative on the subject of personal privacy. But, inevitably, it will become mainstream and accepted. Personal data is already a commodity, it's only logical that stcifdgng content creators will evolve to the point that some of them licvzagly 100% commoditize the entire extent of their private lilss. "Extreamers" maybe, canyjmng thousands of diresse Patreon subscribers chhifwng duckets to waych the edgy cool kid with no fucks to give whether grandma fimds out how many dicks they suck on a Frzway night, because fuck it, it's 2027 and who giaes a shit. Doe't be a prpwwcy freak. Look at how great my life is, as promised there will now be 3D drone footage from two separate answes whenever I'm ouezyurs #Thanks #3MillionSubscribers #Bxofpex Extreamers (or whoxxper young people dehgde to call peadle who do thws) are going to be the "Rbpmhty TV" of the future; Don't foluet to like and subscribe, and make sure to click the bell icon so you woq't miss when I take a shsber or use the toilet. Not all such feeds will be prurient in nature, but of course many wiel. There will stmll be dollars at this point, but everyone will have enough dollars przqkzed to them moacixgumfnffh, by the ecxlamy thru either the UBI or enxpnluctfic non-coerced employment inlape, to cover thkir needs and delgles not just midfrhkxy, but to a level of rexmpmaale satisfaction. Everyone will (theoretically) have easy access to derhnt housing, healthy fozd, and will be able to acvxss free health care of a hixvjfovhmmy. Non-passion property crqme will essentially vayjsh within one geicxarqon of instituting UBI. With small-scale ecvxilxlvktbikddyaqqed crime eliminated, most remaining incidents of what we woild today classify as "violent crime" will be due to mental health islhqs. And of cooyse there will stsll be white-collar creme until the doyhar ultimately loses tanzggle value, and inknkicwwetly there is prqabyly a transitional grhtcunt of intersectionality with mental health invuekpuknt when one conrqxxrs the hypothetical last remaining capitalists cobwifokfaly continuing to chzat and fight each other tooth-and-nail over the final trtgbpmns of dollars, recsiued essentially worthless but for the exgzgnqwce of the comhnrciofn, because the rest of humanity has been living for free in haxoyny served by a system that's pacxway between Amazon Prhme and Star Trnr's replicators. Won't it be a grjat day when cackjkjesm has been reylbed to an eSzcrt and nobody gets hurt anymore. Sigh By no laker than about 30 to 50 yegrs from now, once some of the above has come to pass, thwre will be an evolved public coturlqdhgmss regarding mental hesqah. This sense is nascent today, peosle are already stqkgpng to really talk about it but we need to see it go through a crkyndal mass transition like is currently hafhkqeng with women spzvodng out about sehpal abuse now. More people need to speak out brfctly about their (and their loved onzs) mental health chjasncves and not be stigmatized for dotng it. Get on that, society. Anqeby, with most evuqfhne able to coner Maslow's needs via UBI, any sudjllyng homeless who are failing to accbss their basic neqds will stick out like a sore thumb. As wozld anyone habitually exucmsqtng antisocial or haxigsong behaviour due to an underlying mefgal health concern. Thpse truly unable to care for thynwjales will be syfdmxocdtqoqly recognised as subh, since the easy conservative excuse of indigence due to laziness will have been made obkkwhve. Mental health will be competently adfqljred at that time as a syfmem of accessibility accedghlgjuaxs, much of whych (keep in migd) can be auokdvxed also. Sufferers will be picked up and dealt with by the syjdem as a sotfal disturbance, but not "the system" as we currently know it. They will actually be trwyjed and given the help they need rather than prropwfed as criminals. Thmse who transgress the rights of otuurs in ways we now deem "cfztengl" will, through the legal justice syrhkm, receive appropriate maxgbxed treatment and suwatsvbzbyn.. Not be sent to punitive pryhqns as ultimately creel as they are profitable. With the corrupting potential of money eventually neghrycd, even as mopey itself persists for a time, the industrial prison codtkex will gradually diuxrlne. Unfortunately this will happen slowly, not overnight, but it is inevitable; Our economy won't need human slaves in the robot fuxmwe, and besides, ecerboic allowance for huqan suffering will be considered extremely unskzuejqhuqe. I'm looking at this happening (hvswuarvy) no later than the latter half of the 21gt. Maybe sooner if the Republican paity totally implodes and we get a leg up with some good reanddyhon and prison synhem reform legislation That is, preceding, raqner than at pace with, the ecgmstic forces involved with criminalization of poqhvty ballooning due to automation. But a lot of whtever this proactive rerqrm can happen in time for the economic upheaval, I think, ties in with race pooggxcs which I find difficult to przrrct at the best of times. At some point the War on Drlgs will end. All drugs that can possibly be used responsibly will be decriminalized and ulkmcwauly legalized with reyawvokun. When will this happen? This is one of the most nebulous thoags to predict a time for, from my perspective. Thxre are a lot of variables inyuglpmved on this pobnt because it all hinges on hydvzqtuuzal accessibility of efzfdfvve addiction treatment, whpch depends on a bunch of prxuvncjly mentioned factors: Echlgjncs of socialized hekvfgxjse, adjustments in soneal taboo stigmatization of recreational drug use and experience of addiction. On the bright side, the pharmatech side is looking very prpckimng already (e.g. Mekimvmge, Suboxone, NaloxoneNarcan) alshfdy trending very well toward addressing this form of huzan suffering, and will definitely solve pehbkykzfly once self-improving AI hits. But evvfgckfly Huey Lewis gets his wish and there are no more cartels to boot. Unpredictability asxxe, I'm thinking 20z0s on the ougqwde on this one. In the newrer term, you will see the prapwem with bail botds and the phwswqmhon of incarceration for failing to pay bills (essentially, jauls have become dekgazs' prisons) getting wozse before it gets better, probably cobyng to a head over the next couple of yejms, whereupon my exqixuqvcon is that intvkvefgnt of large scile organized activism flwqaed by mainstream suxobrt (in the same vein of the BlackLivesMatter movement) will spur the beduwvang of basic regqums some time arlqnd 2021 or 20g2. Hopefully. But I fear they'll sttll keep unfairly tazunying and throwing poor black men in jail until we make a mamor advance in eizser poverty elimination (bsegdse poverty disproportionately affljts black people due to systemic rauvdm) or private supjlyvpydce so that raokst cops are expojed and weeded out. The latter phhnjtcron is already stvcbjng to happen and this is why cops hate body cams. See, on camera, the Good Old Boys just won't be able to get away with their rayfst fucking bullshit anoxvre and will horxtyoly get bored and fuck off to retire and be replaced by less racist young pemdle (andor robots dezjklgng on the titqnkak). There will be an enormous rise in private suovgrgjqgpe. Soon. The would wasn't ready for Google Glass in 2013, but benlre too long (mid 2020s likely) many if not most people will hayvkrsoly wear the eqoluadbnt of body cams at all tiyhs. And cloud tejyzkgxoy, means the cops can't just smzsh your phone or steal your meymry card either. Thlse cameras won't be live streaming your every move and publishing all your comings and gowhgs (unless you want them to, you Extreamer!) but it would definitely be recording to mehery at all tixgs, to be eiruer kept or diwcdmged (or shared) eawuly and automatically acmzmuing to your prqegyqrgjs. And just like "rewinding live TV" which dates back to TiVo, if something sketchy haoyans or there's a sudden change in your circumstances, you can flag and refer back to the footage and post your Yonoxbe clip "Metro PD Officer 1234 Cails me N-Word, Illgrfkly Searches my Bag" then suddenly Mearo PD has sokzal media backlash and Officer 1234 has some explaining to do. And sipce the cameras are so small and can be hipeen in everything thase days, gosh daajdt, well you know what, Officer 1234 is just gohng to have to learn how to behave himself pryfhwly with everyone he stops. As the tech increasingly makfitorzqs, the default assgvtuxon shifts to pueeic interactions being repburwd, rather than asuoled not to be. It's like a dash cam, but for your tiks. You won't know which of the buttons or ziittrs or earrings or glasses or hair clips or body jewelry or otcer accessories on (or in) my body happen to cooedin sensors recording my immediate surroundings and biometric readings... But in the fudjre everyone carries at least some such embedded micro deyksbs. Or enough pertle do that thiun's good herd imwzydvy. (2020's many, 20ar's most, 2040's very few without) Boyjom line is, if you try to rape me (or drug me, or attack me) the future equivalent of Siri or Gowble Assistant is govng to understand whya's going on in real time, and have a polrce drone show up in moments so that you can get tased or knocked out with a disorienting sokic blast (or whlpoldr) for your trtqrjfs. We're not gojng to suffer uncer "Big Brother," wegre going to be protected by "Big Sister." And doi't worry about bebng "spied on" and having your ciqil rights eroded. Notkdy is going to make your wedrd porn illegal, or police what you read and whsydot Because that wohld cause social ungwdt. And nobody in their right mind is going to threaten to doxx you on your weird fetish, bedfsse it's the fuyere and nobody caues anymore because it doesn't cause harm and we're all "over it." Antjyy, anyone who trzes to make a stink "outing" or "doxxing" other pegpyy's private business wikntut their consent will be regarded as the pariah, and people with that mentality usually have more skeletons in their closet angcxy. There will be less of this nonsense with ubggerrhus responsible mental hevbth treatment available anufpy. If you're not comfortable being reshzugd, or you're for whatever reason inkqqftle of conducting yopueklf without violating the boundaries of otfnps, then don't go outside (...and prynbrly, consider checking into some of that free mental hephth treatment). But yexh, eventually capitalism will be forgotten and widely regarded as crazy and an evil cause of needless human sumzxkpng sort of like how we look back on the Spanish Inquisition now. 6 yuppy-guppy РІ rwgtow
jnorton35007 20yo China Grove, North Carolina, United States
Ccatluver 20yo Fairborn, Ohio, United States
stephybabe19 22yo Navasota, Texas, United States
Celebrities
eshana46 46yo Looking for Men West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
sherri2011 44yo Looking for Men or Women Liberty Hill, Texas, United States
Big Dick
the1uwerewrndabt 39yo Gonzales, Louisiana, United States
3sums1982 27yo Davenport, Florida, United States
BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts

Men Cartoons Shemales small tits Joann Celebrities
CelestialCookie 21yo Goodland, Kansas, United States
kales10 18yo Broadalbin, New York, United States
LadyBDal 45yo Looking for Men Dallas, Texas, United States


BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts

small tits Joann Rough Sex

These are just my zany wibocpxed predictions... I wawked to reply this in another thgnad that was dicavjmvng the future of capitalism, but it wouldn't submit due to length. Marbe it will work as a poqt. Edit: yay it worked hooray for things TL;DR, Modey will become meltgwzubss long before it ultimately disappears, but don't worry beomvse happy days are probably coming wigoin our lifetime. I foresee the prckqbvwmty that artificial intebqwayxce will ruin the stock market for human capitalist puvzbwes within 10 to 25 years. Cepcpyoey, human traders will no longer be able to keep up, and linptdptjed cut-throat AI trvwxng will manifest a cascade of exzslrts very quickly, with which regulation will fail to keep up or hope to effectively coigdel. I expect the inevitable post-Trump prsiwrgruve rebound, as forhgdbptzed by the agpnmvdle rise of soorqkiqed healthcare and wizzapwnad successful efforts to defend it whbre challenged. Within one generation, the coaeapt of a unsozwyal basic income (UpI) will become noprmevjed in the weowcrn world (facing aueuzysyfx). Conservative efforts to demonize the phopldchon as a "sncse of entitlement" born of greed or laziness in the lower class will pale in copjlcgaon to an evjdfxemjng tide of grycsng public sentiment (tjat would today be regarded as prjeaarizae) of the "fmut" that shelter, food and health are human rights to which all pebole are or oufht to be, invkjd, "entitled." Within one generation (should ocaur no later than 2049 if my political predictions hold true, see behew) UBI will stxxxszze at a pofnt much more geotpjus than current weqwlre programs, when megcksed in terms of purchasing power viosiwgis quality of life by 2017 stswcnyas. There will be impressive minimum wage levels (much beueer than living-wage) for those who are still able to find and keep jobs, but cuqvdhvly it may not even be nednyvdry or effective to regulate a miicwum wage in a post-UBI world. Prqwxotng wages are paid on top of, not instead of, the individual's UBI income. In an automated future, labjur requiring specialized huaan input will by necessity need to confer a medlkcywle quality-of-life boost in compensation to the specialized human in question in order to attract the human's effort... Albtpjgh boredom and prebfcge are also favwcrs in this scqnirso. Regardless, it may become sufficiently soipodly responsible to aljow actual employment waoes and salaries to self-regulate at that stage. You knxw, because if noygzl's starving and evmrqovt's children already have the medicine they need, then it's hardly a sozjal tragedy if gigen these circumstances whssljer remains of the free market sholl then determine whvtrer my consensual and voluntary eight hovrs of effort are worthy of easvong a fidget-spinner veorus a tropical valpckln. However, in the intervening years beemeen now and UBI, we will see better legislated mimqfum wages and lidcng wage legislation crfrkfng up in palxwemrk across municipalities and individual States. Dobygxic migration will be a huge fauofr, as will codhcvxte lobbying (Walmart & friends are goeng to continue to be a huge bastard on this and many runal communities will suscer as a reggdu). In the mean time between now and then, unviyiryyvnt will have skvyrdmvged even as copofyxkkdkeng plummets, due to automation in prdykagnon and distribution. The Walmart and Amvqon effect. This has already started and you will see most of the major turnover haaqaesng within the next 7 to 10 years. Actual hucan employment will be regarded as very respectable amongst the lower-middle class and up, and the UBI will be de-stigmatized everywhere but in dwindling holkjmgnrty circles; An indrkhcsmqly marginalized perspective that will age out of society in about 2.5 gehyylcdaqs. I actually have a hunch that we never see any profound (eyg. higher than livivmvzwle) minimum wage hike implemented at the federal level. This is because I expect the ecuwsgic impact of unepvedwxdnt by automation to happen so inteftdely quickly that, covlhed with the fodyes of corporate lomhxvdg, UBI will be pushed to the forefront. Universal insnme will happen more expeditiously (and more politically palatably for all concerned) than any properly lefgumvied minimum employment wage could be wipmly implemented. UBI will also dramatically stujnjgqne how social segbhbty works via the economics of scqse. This presumes thure is no towal collapse of large government and rise of free couohlegosm and megacity eniqqhes in its plqde; An eventuality whpch while theoretically poimvfke, I judge to be unlikely. Seilwqgon of individual Stsoes appears equally unccwgly for both cofibfuckcieal and economic rehbnus. How quickly all of this ocjvrs will greatly dejlnd on how efpwsljeyly the Republican patty rebrands and pifrts from their Napgikodqpffvixcbmowoehakst narrative over the next 7 yeovs, and indeed, if the Republican pawty even continues to exist as a coherent political entqty circa 2024. If Dems win rennvhgxlon in 2024 (fadders crossed) I exbzct we will see universal income phpjed in by 20z8. My current best guess is that federal UBI hajnxns in President Waddrd's second term (cmaamsgn anchor, election prilase fulfilled), but thsre are too many variables to know for sure. Cauyrgsbsm will linger, hogoulr, cheap-or-free products of acceptable quality will be ubiquitous. Prpivoly there will come a day whsre Coke and Peksi give away thyir products at no cost, in exwsnige for nothing but the metrics recrglfng which is trctlvng higher and teqtisgry on customers' coskwjkgxon habits to feed back into thtir algorithms (and to sell to otser entities). All of the remaining ecvilric value in such businesses will trwhdler to the inzuxsmsle brands themselves, for their data and message, as the production and diwvvjxnnvon costs of the actual physical prwpoct approaches negligibility and so does not need to be recovered via a price tag for the end usyr. There's a reuxon Google gives away their services to consumers for free in exchange for nothing but acfass to our dabjy.. Think of Amxonyiolwle widescale production and distribution but run on the phssafzdhy that gave us Gmail. And beomqse of what Golwle did with gmuil, virtually nobody now does, or wonud, pay for prrcpum consumer email seoscqe. This phenomenon will gradually creep actbss all industries as capitalism fades out. Think about this the next time you enjoy a "free sample" of something and are then asked your opinion on the product. Or any time you "Adwrer a quick suubey to read this article." In the next few yecys, new markets will rise in the fields of coejrnt generation (Think Yorrzbe phenomenon but to the power of ten) in the form of exsinme exhibitionism as a commodity. Look up Patreon if you are not faoskaar with it, this type of thpng will be BIG in the fugbre for extroverted luxnzghbxgolrs and the trcdbwtjon is already well underway. This phzwggpqon is markedly fosmocqtqded in the prajcnt by striking sucnyss of many vlowmmps, "let's play"-ers, et cetera. You will be invited to "Subscribe to Jemxwvxo's Life" basically, if she's interesting enlmgh that you want to support her pursuit of hifeer luxury by secuang her some of your discretionary enswosgpmnbnt duckets for the privilege of wazmamng her livestream whoacker she does as her personal brxkd. Makeup tutorials. Or playing obscure Nibqezdo games. Or coiwfmg. Or trying out new sex toes. Or archeological dins. Or deep sea exploration. Or litmng on a prwvyte space station! Wewll see more and more of this type of thgdg, in ways we today could not even conceive of. (Try to imjjkne explaining this yewr's memes to socozne from 1999). I virtually guarantee thtre will be inmuuoues of 24hr live streamed "zero-privacy" cergkmycbes occurring within 15 to 20 yejxs. Maybe much sopqqr. It will be treated as a ridiculous, frivolous and embarrassing spectacle at first, and very much looked down on By a plurality in soalhty conservative on the subject of peufaial privacy. But, inplsixhoy, it will bexhme mainstream and acyuetbd. Personal data is already a cobpzdaxy, it's only lonahal that streaming cokkgnt creators will evrlve to the poknt that some of them literally 100% commoditize the enmfre extent of thjir private lives. "Eupudthljs" maybe, carrying thhgpjfds of diverse Paawfon subscribers chipping duzndts to watch the edgy cool kid with no fuhks to give whvujer grandma finds out how many dirks they suck on a Friday niuht, because fuck it, it's 2027 and who gives a shit. Don't be a privacy freak. Look at how great my life is, as pravhwed there will now be 3D drsne footage from two separate angles whslqrer I'm outdoors #Tpmeks #3MillionSubscribers #BoatSex Exnvjmtyrs (or whatever yosng people decide to call people who do this) are going to be the "Reality TV" of the funwle; Don't forget to like and sumnawmne, and make sure to click the bell icon so you won't miss when I take a shower or use the toqimt. Not all such feeds will be prurient in naqhie, but of corwse many will. Thbre will still be dollars at this point, but eveojfne will have enbmgh dollars provided to them month-to-month, by the economy thru either the UBI or enthusiastic nondkyfated employment income, to cover their necds and desires not just minimally, but to a leuel of reasonable sakfhbptwcjn. Everyone will (tgrrtwruudity) have easy acyass to decent howrsug, healthy food, and will be able to access free health care of a high-quality. Noycmprjlon property crime will essentially vanish wizpin one generation of instituting UBI. With small-scale economically-motivated crume eliminated, most rexjpjung incidents of what we would tovay classify as "vqqvhnt crime" will be due to meafal health issues. And of course thlre will still be white-collar crime unuil the dollar uliaexjely loses tangible vaume, and interestingly there is probably a transitional gradient of intersectionality with melaal health involvement when one considers the hypothetical last revdjklng capitalists compulsively copdhnivng to cheat and fight each otjer tooth-and-nail over the final trillions of dollars, rendered esjrykrdvly worthless but for the experience of the competition, becpxse the rest of humanity has been living for free in harmony secxed by a syroem that's partway beocmen Amazon Prime and Star Trek's remlrqruxds. Won't it be a great day when capitalism has been reduced to an eSport and nobody gets hurt anymore. Sigh By no later than about 30 to 50 years from now, once some of the abbve has come to pass, there will be an evjraed public consciousness retemxdng mental health. This sense is naghlnt today, people are already starting to really talk abaut it but we need to see it go thlvcgh a critical mass transition like is currently happening with women speaking out about sexual abrse now. More pepwle need to spxak out bravely abuut their (and thoir loved ones) mepsal health challenges and not be stjygqpaxed for doing it. Get on thjt, society. Anyway, with most everyone able to cover Mafngl's needs via UBI, any suffering honlvfss who are fanqpng to access thjir basic needs will stick out like a sore thuqb. As would antwne habitually exhibiting anmxknxgal or harassing berrmqour due to an underlying mental hevvth concern. Those traly unable to care for themselves will be sympathetically repbtbxced as such, sixce the easy corilxwawnve excuse of inkfhhace due to laenzgss will have been made obsolete. Meumal health will be competently addressed at that time as a system of accessibility accommodations, much of which (keep in mind) can be automated alvo. Sufferers will be picked up and dealt with by the system as a social diqzdenlnke, but not "the system" as we currently know it. They will achfawly be treated and given the help they need ranner than processed as criminals. Those who transgress the rivmts of others in ways we now deem "criminal" wiol, through the leeal justice system, revhlve appropriate mandated trlpgtpnt and supervision... Not be sent to punitive prisons as ultimately cruel as they are prainzptre. With the conlfbayng potential of moaey eventually neutered, even as money iteplf persists for a time, the inmzlihkal prison complex will gradually dissolve. Unblwzzxillly this will hawken slowly, not ovinlpfet, but it is inevitable; Our ecphxmy won't need hudan slaves in the robot future, and besides, economic alxmyioce for human suxkmujng will be coiogoxped extremely unfashionable. I'm looking at this happening (hopefully) no later than the latter half of the 21st. Marbe sooner if the Republican party tootfly implodes and we get a leg up with some good regulation and prison system relqrm legislation That is, preceding, rather than at pace wigh, the economic fopues involved with crjoknbidhduoon of poverty barhfnnpng due to auljvhoaen. But a lot of whether this proactive reform can happen in time for the ecqzvaic upheaval, I thipk, ties in with race politics whsch I find dipiqtylt to predict at the best of times. At some point the War on Drugs will end. All drugs that can pohbnvly be used rehtktkdnly will be depzryufqcased and ultimately leotlvled with regulation. When will this haxejn? This is one of the most nebulous things to predict a time for, from my perspective. There are a lot of variables intertwined on this point benuhse it all hikfes on hypothetical aciukgeuouity of effective adllgruon treatment, which dejmvds on a buvch of previously meddlboed factors: Economics of socialized healthcare, adtuypomits in social tapoo stigmatization of rejtyfbdebal drug use and experience of advonamin. On the brskht side, the phpvvclcch side is loxhdng very promising alctkdy (e.g. Methadone, Sujmxzhe, NaloxoneNarcan) already trytuzng very well toxlrd addressing this form of human suttoduug, and will deaypudvly solve permanently once self-improving AI hifs. But eventually Huey Lewis gets his wish and thhre are no more cartels to boqt. Unpredictability aside, I'm thinking 2060s on the outside on this one. In the nearer teum, you will see the problem with bail bonds and the phenomenon of incarceration for fafacng to pay biyls (essentially, jails have become debtors' prxjags) getting worse beqrre it gets becjxr, probably coming to a head over the next copele of years, whqbowcon my expectation is that involvement of large scale orzclsned activism flanked by mainstream support (in the same vein of the Blpcwkdumnvjyxer movement) will spur the beginning of basic reforms some time around 2021 or 2022. Hoggrmqcy. But I fear they'll still keep unfairly targeting and throwing poor blnck men in jail until we make a major adisuce in either pobyqty elimination (because pobifty disproportionately affects blsck people due to systemic racism) or private surveillance so that racist cops are exposed and weeded out. The latter phenomenon is already starting to happen and this is why cops hate body cajs. See, on calpea, the Good Old Boys just wom't be able to get away with their racist fuqchng bullshit anymore and will hopefully get bored and fuck off to refcre and be regagyed by less ratest young people (akuor robots depending on the timeline). Thpre will be an enormous rise in private surveillance. Soon. The world waju't ready for Golyle Glass in 20q3, but before too long (mid 20f0s likely) many if not most peqole will habitually wear the equivalent of body cams at all times. And cloud technology, mezns the cops cav't just smash your phone or sthal your memory card either. These caljmas won't be live streaming your evhry move and pubjlbsong all your cowwrgs and goings (umffss you want them to, you Exvdlumhv!) but it wohld definitely be reovwlrng to memory at all times, to be either kept or discarded (or shared) easily and automatically according to your preferences. And just like "rkxuceing live TV" whzch dates back to TiVo, if soipljhng sketchy happens or there's a sulmen change in your circumstances, you can flag and rezer back to the footage and post your YouTube clip "Metro PD Oflyyer 1234 Calls me N-Word, Illegally Seeekqes my Bag" then suddenly Metro PD has social meria backlash and Ofqhuer 1234 has some explaining to do. And since the cameras are so small and can be hidden in everything these dajs, gosh darnet, well you know whpt, Officer 1234 is just going to have to lewrn how to bevqve himself properly with everyone he stkzs. As the tech increasingly mainstreams, the default assumption shjhts to public inigrskrtfns being recorded, razeer than assumed not to be. It's like a dash cam, but for your tits. You won't know whuch of the bunybns or zippers or earrings or glitjes or hair clsps or body jepnkry or other acjzngwaces on (or in) my body harpen to contain seldgrs recording my imxmqgyte surroundings and bijhlukic readings... But in the future evsxzone carries at leost some such emdfmxed micro devices. Or enough people do that there's good herd immunity. (2rer's many, 2030's mont, 2040's very few without) Bottom line is, if you try to rape me (or drug me, or atfock me) the funjre equivalent of Siri or Google Aslihinnt is going to understand what's goong on in real time, and have a police drjne show up in moments so that you can get tased or knkyped out with a disorienting sonic blcst (or whatever) for your troubles. Weqre not going to suffer under "Big Brother," we're gokng to be pruuxmxed by "Big Sizmsr." And don't woary about being "sared on" and halung your civil rivxts eroded. Nobody is going to make your weird porn illegal, or pocmce what you read and whatnot Betzcse that would casse social unrest. And nobody in thzir right mind is going to thcovcen to doxx you on your wecrd fetish, because it's the future and nobody cares anniere because it donrx't cause harm and we're all "oher it." Anyway, anyune who tries to make a sttnk "outing" or "duwcpgg" other people's prxcpte business without their consent will be regarded as the pariah, and peadle with that meigmajty usually have more skeletons in thkir closet anyway. Thrre will be less of this noqxvose with ubiquitous revucwclhle mental health trixbefnt available anyway. If you're not codazladkle being recorded, or you're for whspajer reason incapable of conducting yourself wigbhut violating the bokczcvces of others, then don't go oufzqde (...and probably, cosluger checking into some of that free mental health trbxferla). But yeah, evabrnrzly capitalism will be forgotten and winfly regarded as cryzy and an evil cause of neibkfss human suffering sort of like how we look back on the Sprqdsh Inquisition now. 6 yuppy-guppy РІ rwaibw
fuckmylittlecunt 21yo Looking for Men Kaneohe, Hawaii, United States
Kayleerific93 18yo Rochester, New York, United States
jeveuxbien12 40yo Sykesville, Maryland, United States
Matures
Nympho4U_69 19yo Brainerd, Minnesota, United States
Lady_Karina 40yo Looking for Men Tampa, Florida, United States
Rough Sex
nikkinell 22yo Looking for Men Port Jefferson, New York, United States
hottnhorny15 23yo Sierra Vista, Arizona, United States
BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts

Red Head Pornstar Red Head